|
Important
notice:
Spanish characters: � is sorted in n, ll is sorted in l+l, ch is
sorted in c+h.
Articles
are written seperately (even if written with uppercase first letter) are not
rated before the name but after the nobility rank: Marqu�s de La Solana to be
found as Solana, Marqu�s de la
|
|
Emplations:
In
newer files, filation of persons is indicated by �└─� for a child and
by �├─� if there are more children. The sign �│ � is used to indicate a passing-by of other filations.
In
other files: Every child is indented one tab
Persons,
whose genealogical relation to former holders of the nobility title is unknown
to me, are registered at the beginning of the line without tab.
The
following lines then relate to this person.
The
known succession of holders of the nobility title is ordinal numbered with
01, 02, 03, etc.
Persons,
only mentioned because of the relative context but not being or have been
holders of the nobility title, are marked with "<>" instead
of an ordinal number.
The
ordinal number 00 is used for holders of the nobility title whose position in
numeral succession is unknown to me; multi-appearance is possible.
If
it is not clearly recognisable to me if a person was holder of the nobility
title, �??� is used instead of an ordinal number (which here does not mean
�probably not�).
A
single question mark means that the statement is doubted.
|
|
If
there is no relationship between the holders of the nobility title, they are
seperated by "---", and the relations between them are
appropriately advised. At the margin, these persons are linked� with red > |
>.
|
|
|
|
In
new files, (one) additional name beside the name by which a person is
generally called is written ibn brackets �{}�.
|
|
In
older files: Among (first) names the name by which a person is generally
called is written in italics. If this name is unknown to me, only two names
are listed. If in the literature (which I have been using) more than two
names appear, they are replaced by �[etc]�. The semantic value of numberless
names is low, they are not necessary to identify a person.
|
|
|
|
Concerning
family names, primer apellidos and segundo apellidos are
listed, mostly connected by "y". Additional apellidos
mentioned in the literature are replaced by �[etc]�. This, for me seems to be
justified as the use of four apellidos only between 1870 and1957 was
legally ordered (see Soler NE [2008]: 34) but was no practical use,
regardless whether some authors constructed such four appelidos. It would be correct to list such additional apellidos if the use was enforced by
legal reasons (e.g. if the possession of a mayoralgo depended) and the
apellidos were really used.
|
|
These
four apellidos are a source of
errors, even for Spanish authors, because they construct parents who never
existed with these names by a wrong combination of the apellidos.
|
|
|
|
Example:
ortizdepinedo.com/f3591.htm (sorry, but no longer in the Internet) had a
person called Antonio Jaramillo y Contreras, who by www.linajecontreras.com/2016/04/17/martin-munoz-de-las-posadas
is named
Manuel Antonio
Jaramillo de Contreras y P�rez del Prado Espinosa. ortizdepinedo.com names
his parents, resolving the 4 apellidos, as N. Jaramillo y Perez and N.
Contreras y Espinosa. But in reality his parents were Manuel Jaramillo de Contreras y Espinosa
and Josefa P�rez Cuesta y Prado.
|
|
|
|
|
Occasionally
the surname of the father or mother is set in brackets �[]� because it really
was not used by the person concerned (regarding Spanish customs on surnames
see e.g. Soler NE [2008]: 32), but for reasons of clearness (so to say as
proper surname) it is listed. Some authors are substituting this name as
surname automatically.
|
|
|
|
Some
general remarks on the numbering of holders of Spanish titles of
nobility:
|
|
-
|
There
is no official numbering of holders of Spanish titles of nobility.
|
|
-
|
The
numbers used in litterature vary. There are different reasons:
|
|
|
-
|
If
the denomination of an title has been changed, sometimes the numbering is
continued, sometimes renewed with 1.
|
|
-
|
Some
holders of Spanish titles of nobility would have been entitled to the heritance
but for different reasons did not sack the necessary carta de sucesi�n
but nevertheless they used the title.
|
|
_
|
Titles
which were provided for the primog�nito
are by some authors automatically attached to the firstborn children who in
reality did not obtain a carta de
sucesi�n.
|
|
-
|
The
cartas de sucesi�n of the Diputaci�n
de la Grandeza during the republican time of Spain between 1931 until
1948 are occasionally counted (of course if there was a convalidaci�n after 1948).
|
|
-
|
There
are titles deprived by juridical sentence. In some cases persons concerned
are not counted as holder of the title.
|
|
-
|
Some
authors construct successions which did not take place in reality.
|
|
-
|
Some
authors did not notice short times of possession of a title although the
publication is traceable in the �Gaceta
de Madrid�.
|
|
-
|
Some
authors mixed up holders with same name(s) of a title of nobility or counted
a single holder twice, sometimes caused by second marriages or by different
names of primer and segundo apellido which were �fitted� although this form of name has not
been used.
|
|
-
|
There are authors (or printers) who have
difficulties in translation of Roman numbers (which are mostly used in Spain
mainly for the numbering of� holders
of titles), e.g. XI for IX
|
|
|
|
Example: Fernando Henr�quez de Luna y Serrano, [jur.obsol] 11. Conde
de Miravalle [Es1690], is named IX Conde in Muley GN [1943-1944]: 322.
|
|
|
-
|
The husband of a female holder of a title of
nobility who only jure uxoris used the title is counted.
|
|
-
|
It
is possible that one person is counted twice because he hold a title of
nobility twice.
|
|
|
|
Example: Joaqu�n Fern�ndez de
C�rdoba y Osma, 9. Duque de Ari�n [Es1725], b1870
d1957, succeded in 1902 as second Marqu�s de Gri��n [Es1862]. He resigned in
1920 in favour of his son Gonzalo (Joaqu�n) Fern�ndez de C�rdoba y
Mari�tegui, 3. Marqu�s de Gri��n [Es1862], b1913 d1934. After his death
without issue he regained the title in 1951 and thus he became fourth Marqu�s
de Gri��n.
|
|
|
|
|
Different from
this is a case that the holder of a title resigned it and got it again later:
Rafael de Burgos y Dom�nguez, 4. Marqu�s de Montemorana [Es1728],
d1882, succeeded his father in 1825, resigned in 1841 �alegando la falta de
caudales� but the Queen then annulated the annulation of the title, and
another �carta de sucesi�n� was issued in 1866.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here
titles of nobility are dated by the year of the first royal resolution for
the creation of the title of nobility. The year when a diploma was issued
(�dipl�) is named separately if it occured in another year. This year
corresponds to the issue of the carta
de sucesi�n and is to be regarded as the legally relevant date. It should
be mentioned that this is not handled consequently by the "Gu�a de la Nobleza" and other
publications. Read to this topic an article by Baron Cobos de Belchite in Hidalguia RG 5[1957]: 799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example,
Guia GT [1975]: 273 and still Elenco GT 44[2011]: 454 give the
creation date may 20, 1834 for Francisco (Mar�a de la Luz) de Arango y
Parre�o [etc], 1. Marqu�s de la Gratitud [Es1834], b1765 d1837, but this was not executed (no carta de sucesi�n) while Domingo de Arango y
Herrera, 2. Marqu�s de la Gratitud [Es1834], b1858 d1924,
succeded and got a carta de sucesion june 10, 1880 (Nieto DNC [1954]:
259-260).
|
|
|
The
succession in a title of nobility (�succ�) is named by the date of the year.
It is generally the year in which the carta de sucesi�n was issued. If
two differend years are named or one ends with a slash "/", the
(first) number is the year in which the issue of the carta de sucesi�n
has been mandated ("B.O.E."). The second number is the year
of the carta de sucesi�n. In newer files, the data are signed with d
for successions granted by the Deputaci�n de la Grandeza, with m (for the
mandate) and c (f�r the carta) respectively.
|
|
Foreign
titles of nobility (mainly of Sicily, Naples, Both Sicilies, Spanish
Netherlands, Sardinia, Italy) to which in Spain a rehabilitaci�n was decreted, are as Spanish titles of nobility
named by the year of the rehabilitaci�n,
the holders are counted from then.
|
|
|
|
A
word concerning the denomination especially on titles of the Holy See
[SS] whose use was allowed in Spain:
It seems
generally, that there were granted only the nobility ranks with the
equivalent title, which could be used on the family name like an Italian
titulo sul cognome. Following this, for example Ram�n Otero y Cot�n Gil
Porras y Turnes, who 1906 got a papal title of a count, should be �Conte
Otero� as this was his family name (primer apellido) while �Cot�n� (segundo
apellido) was the family name of his mother, �Gil Porras� his father�s
mother�s name and �Turnes� was his mother�s mother�s name, which quite
clearly shows that the Spanish permission of 1907 to be �Conde de Turnes�
could scarcely be followed.
|
� COMPACTGEN